|
Tuesday 11 January 2005
Is Al Qaeda Just a Bush Boogeyman?
By Robert Scheer
Los Angeles Times
Is it conceivable that Al Qaeda, as defined by President Bush as the center of a vast and
well-organized international terrorist conspiracy, does not exist?
To even raise the question amid all the officially inspired hysteria is heretical, especially in
the context of the U.S. media's supine acceptance of administration claims relating to national
security. Yet a brilliant new BBC film produced by one of Britain's leading documentary filmmakers
systematically challenges this and many other accepted articles of faith in the so-called war on
terror.
"The Power of
Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear," a three-hour historical film by Adam Curtis
recently aired by the British Broadcasting Corp., argues coherently that much of what we have been
told about the threat of international terrorism "is a fantasy that has been exaggerated and
distorted by politicians. It is a dark illusion that has spread unquestioned through governments
around the world, the security services and the international media."
Stern stuff, indeed. But consider just a few of the many questions the program poses along the way:
- If Osama bin Laden does, in fact, head a vast international terrorist organization with
trained operatives in more than 40 countries, as claimed by Bush, why, despite torture of
prisoners, has this administration failed to produce hard evidence of it?
- How can it be
that in Britain since 9-11, 664 people have been detained on suspicion of terrorism but
only 17 have been found guilty, most of them with no connection to Islamist groups and
none who were proven members of Al Qaeda?
- Why have we heard so much frightening talk
about "dirty bombs" when experts say it is panic rather than radioactivity that would
kill people?
- Why did Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld claim on "Meet the Press" in
2001 that Al Qaeda controlled massive high-tech cave complexes in Afghanistan, when
British and U.S. military forces later found no such thing?
Of course, the documentary does not doubt that an embittered, well-connected and wealthy Saudi man
named Osama bin Laden helped finance various affinity groups of Islamist fanatics that have engaged
in terror, including the 9-11 attacks. Nor does it challenge the notion that a terrifying version
of fundamentalist Islam has led to gruesome spates of violence throughout the world. But the film,
both more sober and more deeply provocative than Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9-11," directly
challenges the conventional wisdom by making a powerful case that the Bush administration, led by a
tight-knit cabal of Machiavellian neoconservatives, has seized upon the false image of a unified
international terrorist threat to replace the expired Soviet empire in order to push a political
agenda.
Terrorism is deeply threatening, but it appears to be a much more fragmented and complex phenomenon
than the octopus-network image of Al Qaeda, with Bin Laden as its head, would suggest.
While the BBC documentary acknowledges that the threat of terrorism is both real and growing, it
disagrees that the threat is centralized:
"There are dangerous and fanatical individuals and groups around the world who have been inspired
by extreme Islamist ideas and who will use the techniques of mass terror � the attacks on America
and Madrid make this only too clear. But the nightmare vision of a uniquely powerful hidden
organization waiting to strike our societies is an illusion. Wherever one looks for this Al Qaeda
organization, from the mountains of Afghanistan to the 'sleeper cells' in America, the British and
Americans are chasing a phantom enemy."
The fact is, despite the efforts of several government commissions and a vast army of
investigators, we still do not have a credible narrative of a "war on terror" that is being fought
in the shadows.
Consider, for example, that neither the 9-11 commission nor any court of law has been able to
directly take evidence from the key post-9-11 terror detainees held by the United States.
Everything we know comes from two sides that both have a great stake in exaggerating the threat
posed by Al Qaeda: the terrorists themselves and the military and intelligence agencies that have a
vested interest in maintaining the facade of an overwhelmingly dangerous enemy.
Such a state of national ignorance about an endless war is, as "The Power of Nightmares" makes
clear, simply unacceptable in a functioning democracy.
Robert Scheer, a journalist with more than 30 years' experience, has built his reputation on the
strength of his social and political writing. His columns appear in newspapers across the country,
and his in-depth interviews have made headlines.
� 2005 Los Angeles Times
comment on this article >
back to top ^
|
