Bob Allen of Wheeling, IL wrote:
Being a person with a keen analytical mind, it perplexes me how the two trade towers which were struck at different heights and angles, collapsed exactly the same given the fact that the first tower was struck much lower than the second. Plus the second tower was struck more in the corner than a direct hit in the middle like tower one, but many floors higher. The second tower had much less weight above the damaged area. Why didn't the top floors of tower 2 fall over towards the weakened corner. Yet they both fell exactly the same way. Very perplexing. Also think about this... you see mostly black smoke coming from tower #2 which I'm pretty sure is a cold fire at best plus it appears that most of the fuel went out the the other side of the building which is seen as a huge fireball. Basic physics: force=mass X acceleration. Do you think that the mass of the fuel in the plane just stopped suddenly and burned up in the building? I think not. Most of the fuel went out the other side of the building.

WTC 7 - Anybody with a half a brain can clearly see that it was a controlled demolition.

Pentagon- Again, clearly, anybody with half a brain can see that there is no way a 757 jumbo jet crashed into the Pentagon. Lets go back to kindergarten for the mentally challenged. A square peg does not fit in a round hole!

Consider all the other circumstances surrounding 9/11, and it just don't add up to what the American people are being sold. I mean told.

Check out this video; maybe the picture will get a little clearer.