Chris of Atlanta, GA wrote:
Several problems with your explanation of #2:

The power was off in only the top half of WTC2, and never off in WTC1.

Scott Forbes denies Ben Fountain's assessment of "unusual evacuations."

Most telling, if bomb sniffing dogs were removed only in the days prior, then the explosives most have been put in AFTER the dogs were removed. How long would it take to wire every floor (as is necessary according to this controlled demolition theory)? Impossible to wire buildings the size of WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 over a weekend, without either massive manpower which would leave too many people knowledgeable, of which none have EVER come forward. I still doubt the possibility of the buildings being wired in a weekend regardless of the manpower used.

So the explosives had to be placed BEFORE the dogs were removed, and therefore had to be placed BEFORE the power outage.

The coincidence of Bush's brother being director is just that, coincidence, unless you believe that there was prior knowledge of George Bush becoming president in order for anything to be "planned" in the years prior to GWB taking office.

That leaves the timeline of 8 months to wire the buildings for explosives, which has not been explained how it could have been done without being noticed. The power down theory cannot be considered viable, since there was no power outage in WTC1, and only half of WTC2 was affected, and there were WTC employees in the building with unrestricted access to any part of the affected areas.