Chris of Bavaria, Germany wrote:
The evidence gives a schocking picture of what might have really happened the days surrounding 9/11. On the other side, the massive geo-politics shows who benefits (political and economic) from this day. I think most "interventionists" remain "dedicated to 9/11". It was a key event for people in the US and the rest of the world. First, for the many victims, and then for the many perople shot down or lawlessly arrested for "freedom" and "democracy". The other side is begging for truth and only gets no-answers or nonsense-answers. What game are these men playing?

With this mass of incredibility, lies, and cover-ups - how can they get through all this without being harmed? They live off of the "standard-bearers" or "patriots" who are watching and reading mainstream-media and telling the sceptics: "I've read nothing more about 9/11 than the 911-Comission - I don`t even wanna hear what you've got to say - but I know that YOU ARE WRONG!"

The evidence is so easy to see, you don`t need any long-haired-hippie-underground-fanatic-idiot-conspiracy; you only need some scepticism and a little trust in yourself.

For me it seems quite clear after researching for over 4 years. Nothing targets the other direction. I've found nothing that relieves the government or investigators of covering this up.

9/11 is stranger than fiction! For the anonymous poster: look at the NIST Report a second time and ask yourself: "Why the hell does the report stop at exactly that point where the real myth - the collapse to the ground - begins?" - Yes, my friend, NIST only examines "how the collapse could be initiated" - not how it really happened. That's only one example.

Another example: look at the new Pentagon Video Footage . Some newspapers wrote it "documented the impact" - huh? I can`t see a 757? Do you? Who does?

It's all about questions, and they want us to say "oh, don't ask, it's so bad, only the government can handle these secrets..."

Real freedom and democracy does not know stupid questions - it only knows stupid answers.

On a traditional court this case would be so conspicuous - no attorney or judge would believe these nonsense facts and opaque accusations. So they make their own court with their own people and their own laws? Yes, tragically that looks better for the cover-up and its perpetrators.