A Journal of America's Political Soul Heaven & Earth: Where Politics and Spirituality Meet
April 24, 2014  
Home Receive G&G for free... SPROUTS - Reader comments, discussion, and feedback... Contribute your writings to G&G future issues... More information on the current topic... Previous topics covered... Why Garlic? Why Grass? Why now? Contact G&G...

Issue No. 9 - Heaven & Earth
F E A T U R E S :

New » From Darkness, Awakening

New » On Morality

New » On Courage

Spirit Matters:
G&G Interviews Michael Lerner

We Still Need a Religious Left

9/11 and the American Empire:
How Should Religious People Respond?

Saving Fundamentalists From the Religious Right

The Dark Jesus: Spiritual Imagery Inspires Change and Heals Racism

Will We Choose To Survive?

A Sneak-Peak Interview with the Messiah

G&G Arts - Essay
Whose Good? Who's Evil?


Saving Fundamentalists From the Religious Right

It's Time to Open Our Hearts and Minds

Years ago, I had a bumper sticker on my little red Mazda that read, "The Christian Right is Neither." I had just left ministry and enjoyed the irony of the message. Sly humor, especially humor that drives home a point, has always appealed to me; and these were the early 1990s. The Christian Coalition under the leadership of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, to name two recognizable figures, had emerged as a powerful base to be exploited by the right-wing of the Republican Party for their own Machiavellian aims.

Today, a decade later, the Christian Right has grown and become something of a powerbase for the kinder and gentler face of fascism in this country. I think that it is necessary, however, for those of us who incline to the left to draw a distinction between the political entity that the Christian Right has become and fundamentalist Christians who seek to live according to God's will, as they understand it.

In order to be honest, and so my prejudices are identified before proceeding, I need to make a few disclaimers here.

  • I have no love for the Christian Right;
  • I am not a fundamentalist Christian;
  • I do not see the Bible as literally inspired and absolute truth;
  • While I believe that there is a God, I remain agnostic with regards to religious expression.

Some of My Best Friends Are Fundamentalists

Let me be clear. I do not dislike fundamentalist Christians. What I dislike is the feeling I get that their good intentions and commitment to live lives of faith are being manipulated in our country to establish a plutocracy in place of a representative republic. I have the advantage of a rather complete theological education. While I am loathe to play the role of the pedagogue, I find that the stratagem employed by the Bush administration to utilize the faith of theologically unsophisticated persons is reprehensible to both faith and democracy.

I know and have known many, many fundamentalist Christians. The great majority of them are good and moral people. They do not hate others, but instead are driven by a conviction that God wishes the salvation of all through a particular experience of acceptance of Christ as a "personal savior" (a phrase that never occurs in the bible). I disdain the caricature of the lubricious deacon or elder that prays on Sunday and commits all matter of ill toward his or her fellows for the next six days. For most fundamentalists, this contradictory lifestyle simply does not exist. Most struggle daily to keep faith, to do good for others, and to be decent people.

As members of the left, we cannot disdain fundamentalists' faith commitments or their choices. Indeed, we must affirm their right to worship as they see fit and to bring their voices into the dialog. We should also be clearly aware that not all fundamentalists are members of the right wing. Some have taken to heart the biblical texts that call for compassionate action on behalf of the disenfranchised and marginalized, inclusive of gay and lesbian people and undocumented people. Many take seriously care for our natural environment. The fundamentalist community is more diverse than we in the left may find comfortable; indeed, while we've talked about inclusivity and diversity, they've been doing it.

It is the coalescence of the right-wing's political agenda with faith that I find frustrating. Reinhold Niebuhr was correct when he asserted that people who are uniformly moral as individuals are capable of gross immorality as groups. I do not believe that most Germans were, individually, immoral or cruel during the 1930s and the 1940s. I am painfully aware that most said nothing as the machinery of evil created a killing machine and instigated a program of genocide that targeted Jews, Gypsies, and gays.

Today, as I look around, I cannot help but wonder if this is not possible in our country.

Diverging From Scripture, Conscience, and Common Sense

The Christian Right has proposed a moral agenda that includes homophobic legislation seeking to limit the rights of citizens of our nation. The Christian Right has equated the people of God with the United States, and sees no contradiction in a clear conflation of God with Country. The Christian Right has stood repeatedly against the rights of the undocumented. The Christian Right has embraced capitalism as a divine right.

On that last point – capitalism – it is an extraordinarily curious thing to note the way the Christian Right, in its modern political formulation, ignores the history of the church. It is clear that throughout its history, the church has tended toward socialism rather than capitalism. Read the Book of Acts (in the New Testament, following the four gospels). St. Luke speaks about the church giving up all of its possessions and living with all of its things in common ownership. Each received according to need, all contributed to the good of the whole. Widows and orphans were cared for by the community. Charity was common (dare I say the word welfare?). The early church fathers were also of one voice regarding material wealth – until the time of Constantine, that is, at which point Christianity became a religio licito as the emperor embraced the faith, and that which had formerly been persecuted was subsidized.

Consider the words attributed to Jesus in St. Matthew 25:


25:31 When the Son of Man comes in his glory and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. All the nations will be assembled before him, and he will separate people one from another like a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. Then the king will say to those on his right, �Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.' Then the righteous will answer him, �Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or naked and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?' And the king will answer them, �I tell you the truth just as you did it for one of the least of these brothers or sisters of mine, you did it for me.'

There is no mention of a belief in a particular creed or of an experience of a prescribed event. Jesus of Nazareth calls for compassion and care, the deeds of faith for those in need. 

The bible is not of one voice. It is a richly diverse document that welcomes dialog with itself as its authors attempt to parse out truth that goes beyond the literal meaning of the text. Consider how the New Testament authors use the Old Testament. Even a cursory reading reveals that they were not taking the text literally.

Let Us Embrace All of Our Neighbors

Ultimately, as activists on the left, we do the nation a huge disservice by disenfranchising people of faith. The neo-fascists have discovered their goodwill and converted it into political capital. I think it is time for us to begin a meaningful dialog with our friends of all religious persuasions and ask what it means to be a child of God in the political world we find ourselves in.

We need to listen and to speak. We need to learn their language so we can share our thoughts. And we need to see past the caricatures, look into the hearts of our neighbors, and ask every person about God's love of the poor, the broken, and the disenfranchised.


Paul H. G. Plasencia (p.plasencia@sbcglobal.net) was educated at Trinity Lutheran Seminary, in Columbus, Ohio and the Claremont School of Theology in Claremont, California. He served the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America as a pastor for 15 years. Following a crisis of faith, he left ministry and the church and now teaches high school history in Ventura, California.

comment on this article >
show comments (1)  
back to top ^


Latest at G&G
03.13 - I have very extensively researched the Twin Tower Collapses
more >
03.06 - Your article makes a hell of a lot of sense, I must say.
more >

PARTY NEWS
Green Party
Democratic Party
Republican Party
Libertarian Party

ALTERNATIVE NEWS
Indymedia
IPS International
OneWorld
GNN

CORPORATE NEWS
New York Times
Washington Post
   other US dailies

NONPROFIT NEWS
AlterNet
Buzzflash
Common Dreams
Democracy Now
Labor Start
Mother Jones
The Nation
Tom Paine.com
The Progressive
Tikkun
Truth Out

FEATURED NEWS
9-11 Blogger

 

Front Page | Contact | Subscribe
most content © 2014 garlic & grass
some fair use content