A Journal of America's Political Soul Heaven & Earth: Where Politics and Spirituality Meet
May 27, 2024  
Home Receive G&G for free... SPROUTS - Reader comments, discussion, and feedback... Contribute your writings to G&G future issues... More information on the current topic... Previous topics covered... Why Garlic? Why Grass? Why now? Contact G&G...

Issue No. 1 - THE VOTE
C O N T E N T S :

Update » No Paper, No Trail: An Open Invitation to Electoral Fraud


A Vote That Counts

2002 Elections Underscore Imperative of Major Reform

Libertarian Solutions for Revitalizing Our Democracy

Spoiled? Ralph Nader and Voting Patterns in 2000

Post-Democracy: The Dystopian Future of Our Winner-Take-All Politics

Voter Turnout: How To Hit 90% by 2010

Vote, Organize, Vote, and Win - For a Progressive Society

SPECIAL: G&G Wellness

Resources for The Vote

Defining Our Terms...

Instant runoff voting, also sometimes called "Ranked Choice Voting" and "1-2-3 Voting," allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference. It is a winner-take-all, constitutionally protected, voting system that ensures a winning candidate will receive a majority of votes rather than a simple plurality. IRV also saves money by eliminating the need for runoff elections.

Instant runoff voting allows for better voter choice and wider voter participation by accommodating multiple candidates in single seat races and assuring that a "spoiler"-effect will not result in undemocratic outcomes. IRV allows all voters to vote for their favorite candidate without fear of helping elect their least favorite candidate, and it ensures that the winner enjoys true support from a majority of the voters. Plurality voting, used in most American elections, does not meet these basic requirements for a fair election system that promotes wide participation, and traditional runoff elections are costly to the taxpayer and often suffer from low voter turnout.

Read more on IRV at www.instantrunoff.com
Proportional representation (PR) distributes seats in a legislature to parties based on the number of votes each party gets. It is based on the principle that any group of like-minded voters should win legislative seats in proportion to its share of the popular vote. Whereas the winner-take-all principle awards 100% of the representation to a 50.1% majority, PR allows voters in a minority to win their fair share of representation. There is a broad range of PR systems. Some are based on voting for political parties; others for candidates. Some allow very small groupings of voters to win seats; others require higher thresholds of support to win representation. All promote more accurate, balanced representation of the spectrum of political opinion in a given electorate.

Currently there are 41 well-established democracies with at least two million inhabitants and high ratings from the human rights organization Freedom House. Of these 41 nations, only two (the United States and Canada) do not use a form of proportional or semi-proportional voting systems to elect at least one of their national legislatures. Most use full proportional representation for their most powerful national legislature.

Read more on PR from the Center on Voting and Democracy
Public Financing
Public Financing of Elections grants to qualified candidates some money to spend on their campaigns, usually with a stipulation that the amount spent and the amount raised from other, private sources be limited.
The current system used in the United States for most elections, Winner-Take-All elections grant to the winner of a plurality of votes (i.e. more votes than any other candidate, but not necessarily a majority) the full power to represent all those who voted for or against him.
A system that grants the first candidate to receive a certain number of votes, say, a majority, victory in the race. This method is also frequently used in PR systems, though it often fails to accurately reflect the distribution of votes in a particular constituency.


Sites For More Information...

Latest at G&G
03.13 - I have very extensively researched the Twin Tower Collapses
more >
03.06 - Your article makes a hell of a lot of sense, I must say.
more >

Green Party
Democratic Party
Republican Party
Libertarian Party

IPS International

New York Times
Washington Post
   other US dailies

Common Dreams
Democracy Now
Labor Start
Mother Jones
The Nation
Tom Paine.com
The Progressive
Truth Out

9-11 Blogger


Front Page | Contact | Subscribe
most content © 2024 garlic & grass